Criterica Capital works with qualified capital providers. It does not hold or commit capital itself. Financing availability, eligibility and terms depend on the applicable provider and transaction.
Criterica Capital is built on the Splitifi data science platform. The risk intelligence and infrastructure behind your file are institutional in design. Capital comes from qualified capital providers, and terms depend on the provider.
We are not managing quarterly earnings pressure, proxy vote risk, or corporate development processes. Our organizational attention is on risk intelligence and matching files with qualified capital providers.
Part of Criterica Group and underwritten by outcome intelligence trained on legal data. Every risk assessment is made on case and portfolio merit, not relationship history.
Your capital provider needs to be here at resolution — not just at signing.
Case portfolios span years. The capital provider you engage at signing is the organization you need at resolution. That requires organizational stability that extends well beyond the initial agreement date. Criterica Capital prepares requests for access to qualified capital providers; the provider, not Criterica Capital, commits the capital and sets the terms.
Capital partners in active M&A processes, pending SPAC transactions, or corporate restructurings carry a specific category of risk: management attention divided, capital potentially redirected to transaction costs and integration, and organizational continuity contingent on events outside the control of either party to your portfolio agreement.
Due diligence on a capital partner should include the same scrutiny applied to any multi-year institutional counterparty: capital structure review, public filing analysis, and direct questions about management continuity and operational focus.
Questions every law firm should ask a capital partner before signing.
The terms of a capital facility are only as reliable as the institution behind them. These questions go beyond rate and structure to address organizational stability and counterparty durability.
Statistics shown reflect historical or illustrative model outputs derived from real case data. They are not predictions or guarantees of any individual outcome. Litigation results depend on facts, jurisdiction, judge, and counsel, and vary case by case. Model accuracy is subject to selection effects and changing legal dynamics.