We deploy from committed capital, not from capital markets or pending transaction closings. Deployment capacity does not hinge on the completion of any corporate event.
Criterica Capital is built on the Splitifi data science platform. The team, infrastructure, and capital access that underwrite your portfolio are institutional in design and built to hold through rate cycles and market dislocations.
We are not managing quarterly earnings pressure, proxy vote risk, or corporate development processes. Our organizational attention is on portfolio underwriting and deployment — nothing else.
Part of Criterica Group and underwritten by outcome intelligence trained on court records. Every deployment decision is made on case and portfolio merit, not relationship history.
Your funder needs to be here at resolution — not just at signing.
Case portfolios span years. The capital partner you engage at signing is the organization you need at resolution — funding draw requests, executing on co-investment options, managing payoffs on complex structured positions. That requires organizational stability that extends well beyond the initial agreement date.
Capital partners in active M&A processes, pending SPAC transactions, or corporate restructurings carry a specific category of risk: management attention divided, capital potentially redirected to transaction costs and integration, and organizational continuity contingent on events outside the control of either party to your portfolio agreement.
Due diligence on a capital partner should include the same scrutiny applied to any multi-year institutional counterparty: capital structure review, public filing analysis, and direct questions about management continuity and operational focus.
Questions every law firm should ask a capital partner before signing.
The terms of a capital facility are only as reliable as the institution behind them. These questions go beyond rate and structure to address organizational stability and counterparty durability.
Statistics shown reflect historical or illustrative model outputs derived from real case data. They are not predictions or guarantees of any individual outcome. Litigation results depend on facts, jurisdiction, judge, and counsel, and vary case by case. Model accuracy is subject to selection effects and changing legal dynamics.