MDL TrackerAntitrust

Broiler Chicken Grower (No. III)

MDL No. 3167  ·  U.S. District Court for the District of Utah
MDL No.
3167
Docket Type
Antitrust
Transferee Judge
Hon. David B. Barlow
Centralized
2025-12-16
Actions Pending
6
As Of
2026-09-01
Funding Considerations

Broiler Chicken Grower Antitrust Litigation (No. III) is the latest in a series of related MDLs brought by contract poultry growers alleging that major chicken processors suppressed the compensation growers receive under tournament-style payment arrangements, in part through shared compensation and performance data exchanged among competing integrators. Centralized in the District of Utah in December 2025, this third-numbered docket carries just 6 pending actions, reflecting a very early stage even relative to its already-narrow predecessor matters.

For a funder, this is a commercial claim by agricultural business operators — contract growers who raise poultry under agreements with integrators — not a personal-injury or medical-lien matter. What the 'No. III' designation signals is useful context: this theory of suppressed grower compensation through data-sharing has already been tested in related, earlier-numbered dockets, which reduces novel-theory risk relative to a first-of-its-kind claim, even though this specific docket's own record is still thin given its recent centralization and small action count.

Given the small size and early phase here, portfolio finance across a broad grower claimant pool is premature; the more realistic near-term structure is single-matter or small-group litigation-cost funding under Criterica Capital's commercial litigation finance line, informed by how the related earlier Broiler Chicken Grower dockets have progressed. Growers considering funding should expect terms to reflect this docket's own limited procedural history rather than assuming full parity with a more mature related matter. A structure and litigation brief is also available.

Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of claim is at issue for growers in this MDL?
+
Does the related earlier Broiler Chicken Grower litigation help with funding this docket?
+
Is portfolio finance available for a group of growers here?
+
What Criterica Capital product fits this docket?
+

Pre-settlement funding is a non-recourse purchase of a portion of the proceeds of a pending legal claim — not a loan. If the case does not result in a recovery, nothing is owed. Rates, fees, and repayment terms are disclosed in full in the funding agreement, which the applicant’s attorney reviews before signing. Availability and terms vary by state.

Litigation structure and resolution-risk brief on Criterica Intelligence →
Holding Broiler Chicken Grower (No. III) claims or inventory?
Send the details and our institutional team will respond within one business day.