MDL TrackerSales Practices

General Motors Air Conditioning

MDL No. 2818  ·  U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
MDL No.
2818
Docket Type
Sales Practices
Transferee Judge
Hon. Matthew F. Leitman
Centralized
2018-02-01
Actions Pending
15
As Of
2026-09-01
Funding Considerations

This docket consolidates consumer class actions alleging that air conditioning systems in certain Chevrolet, GMC, and Cadillac truck and SUV models are defective, causing the systems to crack, leak refrigerant, lose pressure, and fail, and that the manufacturer's repair efforts did not fix the underlying problem. Centralized in the Eastern District of Michigan in 2018, the docket carries 15 pending actions brought on behalf of proposed statewide purchaser and lessee classes across multiple states.

For a funder, this is a consumer product-defect class action with a warranty and consumer-protection damages theory, closer to a repair-cost and diminished-value framework than a personal-injury one: proposed damages classes are grounded in the cost of the defect itself, particularly since a stated repair effort reportedly did not resolve the issue, rather than any physical injury. Class certification has been genuinely contested, including judicial scrutiny of whether the claims can generate the kind of common answers needed to certify statewide classes covering thousands of vehicle owners, which is the central open question shaping this docket's value.

That profile supports firm-level litigation cost financing for plaintiffs' counsel managing the class-certification fight and expert-driven common-defect proof across multiple state classes, rather than individual vehicle-owner funding. Criterica Capital's commercial litigation finance line applies to this kind of consumer class-action cost financing, with underwriting weighted heavily toward class-certification prospects given the docket's current procedural posture. A structure and litigation brief on the current claim population and class-certification status is also available.

Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of damages theory applies to this MDL?
+
What is the biggest open question shaping this docket's value?
+
Is individual vehicle-owner funding relevant here?
+
What Criterica Capital product fits this matter?
+

Pre-settlement funding is a non-recourse purchase of a portion of the proceeds of a pending legal claim — not a loan. If the case does not result in a recovery, nothing is owed. Rates, fees, and repayment terms are disclosed in full in the funding agreement, which the applicant’s attorney reviews before signing. Availability and terms vary by state.

Litigation structure and resolution-risk brief on Criterica Intelligence →
Holding General Motors Air Conditioning claims or inventory?
Send the details and our institutional team will respond within one business day.