MDL TrackerCommon Disaster

ONE Apus Container Ship Incident

MDL No. 3028  ·  U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
MDL No.
3028
Docket Type
Common Disaster
Transferee Judge
Hon. Paul A. Engelmayer
Centralized
2022-06-01
Actions Pending
59
As Of
2026-09-01
Funding Considerations

This docket consolidates purely commercial maritime cargo-loss claims arising from the November 30, 2020 incident in which the container ship ONE Apus encountered severe Pacific storm conditions en route from Asia to the U.S. West Coast, lost approximately 1,800 containers overboard, and suffered additional cargo damage from collapsed container stacks, one of the largest single-vessel cargo losses on record. Centralized in the Southern District of New York in 2022, the docket carries 59 pending actions, split between subrogated cargo underwriters and shippers seeking direct recovery, and vessel-interest parties pursuing indemnification claims against non-vessel-operating common carriers.

For a funder, this is a fundamentally different risk profile than a personal-injury or consumer mass tort: claimants are almost entirely sophisticated commercial parties, cargo underwriters, shippers, and freight intermediaries, with claim values that can be sized directly against bills of lading, cargo manifests, and insured values. Liability theories here turn on maritime law doctrines governing carrier liability limitations, seaworthiness, and stowage practices rather than a contested general-causation dispute, which narrows the range of open legal uncertainty relative to a novel liability theory.

That profile is well suited to Criterica Capital's commercial litigation finance line, particularly for cargo underwriters or freight forwarders holding a documented book of subrogated or direct claims tied to this specific voyage. Portfolio underwriting is realistic given the shared factual predicate across claimants, though maritime liability-limitation defenses specific to the carrier and vessel interests should be priced into any facility. A structure and litigation brief on the current claim population and procedural posture is also available for firms evaluating a specific claim book.

Frequently Asked Questions
Who are the actual claimants in this MDL?
+
Is portfolio finance realistic for a cargo underwriter's book of claims here?
+
What legal framework governs liability in this docket?
+
What Criterica Capital product fits a claim in this docket?
+

Pre-settlement funding is a non-recourse purchase of a portion of the proceeds of a pending legal claim — not a loan. If the case does not result in a recovery, nothing is owed. Rates, fees, and repayment terms are disclosed in full in the funding agreement, which the applicant’s attorney reviews before signing. Availability and terms vary by state.

Litigation structure and resolution-risk brief on Criterica Intelligence →
Holding ONE Apus Container Ship Incident claims or inventory?
Send the details and our institutional team will respond within one business day.