MDL TrackerSales Practices

Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company

MDL No. 2695  ·  U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico
MDL No.
2695
Docket Type
Sales Practices
Transferee Judge
Hon. Robert J. Shelby
Centralized
2016-04-11
Actions Pending
17
As Of
2026-09-01
Funding Considerations

This docket consolidates consumer class actions alleging that the manufacturer of Natural American Spirit cigarettes falsely labeled and advertised the product as "natural," "additive-free," and less harmful than conventional cigarettes, claims that trace to a 2015 FDA warning letter and that the manufacturer has since agreed to stop using on packaging and in advertising. Centralized in the District of New Mexico in 2016, the docket carries 17 pending actions, a number that has held essentially flat for years, reflecting a consumer false-advertising claim rather than a personal-injury theory with a growing or shrinking exposure population.

For a funder, this is a consumer-protection and false-advertising damages framework, not a personal-injury one: value is tied to the price premium consumers allegedly paid based on the challenged claims, aggregated across a purchaser class, rather than individualized injury damages. That makes claim-by-claim, individual-plaintiff funding largely beside the point; the more relevant capital conversation, where one exists, is with a law firm managing the litigation costs of pursuing class certification and merits discovery across a genuinely large, geographically dispersed purchaser class.

Criterica Capital's commercial litigation finance line can apply to firm-level litigation cost financing in a consumer class action of this kind, with underwriting focused on class-certification prospects and the strength of the underlying deceptive-labeling record, including the regulatory history that prompted the labeling changes, rather than on individual purchaser documentation. A structure and litigation brief on the current claim population and procedural posture is also available for firms evaluating this matter.

Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of damages are at issue in this MDL?
+
Is individual plaintiff funding relevant in this docket?
+
What underwriting factors matter most for a firm's litigation costs here?
+
What Criterica Capital product applies to this matter?
+

Pre-settlement funding is a non-recourse purchase of a portion of the proceeds of a pending legal claim — not a loan. If the case does not result in a recovery, nothing is owed. Rates, fees, and repayment terms are disclosed in full in the funding agreement, which the applicant’s attorney reviews before signing. Availability and terms vary by state.

Litigation structure and resolution-risk brief on Criterica Intelligence →
Holding Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company claims or inventory?
Send the details and our institutional team will respond within one business day.