Co-Investment

Capital to complete oversized tickets alongside your position.

When a case exceeds your fund's single-case concentration limit, Criterica Capital can prepare a co-investment request for independent capital providers to complete the ticket behind your position.

Deal-by-deal co-investment structures are explored for established litigation funders with strong origination pipelines.

How It Works
01
You lead the case
You've done your diligence and want the case — but it exceeds your single-case concentration limit or depletes your deployment capacity.
02
A co-investor completes the ticket
Criterica Capital prepares the request, and an independent capital provider may come in behind your position to complete the ticket. Your economics and lead position are preserved. The provider takes a defined participation.
03
Shared recovery
Recovery is allocated according to the participation structure agreed at execution. Both parties benefit from case resolution.
Our Role

Co-investors participate behind established funders who have done the origination, diligence, and relationship work, with every position priced from the court record by Criterica.

Criterica Capital’s evaluation validates the case value independently, using its outcome models. Co-investment terms are agreed at the deal level before any capital moves.

Case Types We Review for Co-Investment
Commercial disputes over $5M
Patent and IP litigation
Mass tort MDL positions
International arbitration
False Claims Act / qui tam
Securities class actions
Antitrust matters
Complex employment class actions
How We Underwrite

Every financing request Criterica Capital prepares is evaluated against outcomes, not collateral. Our models are trained on real court records across US federal courts, state courts, and international jurisdictions.

We assess jurisdiction-level recovery rates, case-type outcome distributions, time-to-resolution curves, and attorney performance history before a request is prepared for independent capital providers.

01
Outcome models
Predictive models for each case type and jurisdiction
02
Court record depth
Verified decisions used in model training
03
Jurisdiction calibration
Circuit, district, and state-level recovery benchmarks
04
Recovery modeling
Expected value, settlement range, and duration estimates per case
Discuss co-investment on your next oversized matter.
Contact Our Team

Talk to us about your book.

FAQ

Questions

Keep reading