Structure Comparisons

Compare capital structures side by side.

Plain comparisons of the structures institutional participants actually choose between — mechanics, cost, recourse, and when each one wins.

Litigation finance covers a wide range of structures that are frequently confused with one another, or with adjacent products like bank credit or insurance. Each comparison below sets out who each option is for, how it works, how it is priced, how risk is allocated, and when one structure outperforms the other.

Litigation Finance
Funder vs. Broker
The party that deploys the capital versus the intermediary who shops your claim to find it.
Licensed Funder vs. Unlicensed Funder
What state licensing actually changes about a litigation funding relationship, and where the question doesn't apply at all.
Litigation Finance vs. After-the-Event Insurance
Capital to fund a case versus protection against paying the other side's costs if it fails — and why claimants often use both.
Judgment Preservation Insurance vs. Litigation Funding
Insuring against a favorable outcome being reduced on appeal versus advancing capital to reach that outcome in the first place.
Defense-Side Funding vs. Plaintiff-Side Funding
Capital structured around defending a claim versus capital structured around pursuing one — different collateral, different repayment logic.
Special Situations Funding vs. Standard Litigation Finance
Bespoke capital for unusual or complex legal-adjacent situations versus the conventional non-recourse advance against a straightforward claim.
Fund Capital
Commercial Litigation
Commercial Litigation Finance vs. Contingency Fee Arrangement
Third-party capital against the claim versus the attorney absorbing the case's economic risk through their own fee.
Claim Monetization vs. Litigation Funding
Selling an interest in a claim outright for immediate value versus advancing capital repaid from the claim's future proceeds.
IP Litigation Finance vs. Commercial Litigation Finance
Funding a patent, trademark, or trade secret claim carries risks and dynamics that broader commercial funding doesn't fully capture.
Government Contract Claims Finance vs. Commercial Claims Finance
Financing a dispute against a sovereign counterparty and its distinct procedural rules versus financing an ordinary private commercial claim.
Environmental & Regulatory Claims Finance vs. Commercial Litigation Finance
Financing claims shaped by statutory liability schemes and scientific proof versus ordinary commercial disputes governed by contract and tort law alone.
Don't see the comparison you need?
Send us your structure question and our institutional team will respond within one business day.
Contact Us