Bankruptcy Trusts

Asbestos bankruptcy trusts, with every fact cited to the trust.

Debtor, court, claims processor and payment percentage for each trust, compiled from the trust's published documents and court records.

Bankruptcy and distressed assets are a Criterica Capital vertical. Criterica Capital prices legal assets from court records and private settlement data and prepares requests for independent funders, who each decide on their own. Criterica Capital does not fund, lend or decide.

28
Trusts listed
1982
Earliest petition year
2019
Latest petition year
18
With a published payment percentage
Directory
Sort by28 of 28 trusts
TrustDebtorCourtPetitionPayment percentage
A.P. GreenDebtorGlobal Industrial Technologies, Inc., A.P. Green Industries, Inc., and related debtorsCourtNot listedPetition2002Payment percentage6.0%as of Apr 13, 2026Armstrong WorldDebtorArmstrong World Industries, Inc.CourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2000Payment percentage7.8%as of Oct 5, 2026Babcock & WilcoxDebtorThe Babcock & Wilcox Company and certain subsidiariesCourtNot listedPetition2000Payment percentage4.3%as of Jun 30, 2026CelotexDebtorThe Celotex Corporation and Carey Canada Inc.CourtMiddle District of Florida, Tampa DivisionPetition1990Payment percentage7%as of Jun 23, 2023Combustion EngineeringDebtorCombustion Engineering, Inc.CourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2003Payment percentage15.3%as of Apr 1, 2026CongoleumDebtorCongoleum Corporation, Congoleum Sales, Inc., and Congoleum Fiscal, Inc.CourtDistrict of New Jersey (reference withdrawn from the Bankruptcy Court)Petition2003Payment percentageNot listedDII IndustriesDebtorDII Industries, LLC (formerly Dresser Industries) and certain affiliated debtors; the...CourtWestern District of PennsylvaniaPetition2003Payment percentageNot listedDuro DyneDebtorDuro Dyne National Corp., et al.CourtNot listedPetitionNot listedPayment percentage20%as of Jul 10, 2026Eagle-PicherDebtorEagle-Picher Industries, Inc. et al.CourtSouthern District of Ohio, Western DivisionPetitionNot listedPayment percentageNot listedFederal-MogulDebtorFederal-Mogul Corporation (T&N, FMP, Fel-Pro and Vellumoid entities)CourtDistrict of DelawarePetitionNot listedPayment percentage2.9%as of Jun 30, 2026GarlockDebtorGarlock Sealing Technologies LLC, et al., and OldCo, LLC (successor by merger to Coltec...CourtWestern District of North CarolinaPetition2010Payment percentageNot listedH.K. PorterDebtorH.K. Porter Company, Inc.CourtWestern District of PennsylvaniaPetition1991Payment percentage3.0%as of Jan 9, 2025Kaiser AluminumDebtorKaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation and affiliated debtorsCourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2002Payment percentage10.6%as of Feb 5, 2025Leslie ControlsDebtorLeslie Controls, Inc.CourtDistrict of DelawarePetitionNot listedPayment percentage6.25%as of Jul 14, 2025ManvilleDebtorJohns-Manville CorporationCourtSouthern District of New YorkPetition1982Payment percentage5.6%as of Sep 3, 2026MaremontDebtorMaremont Corporation and three affiliated debtorsCourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2019Payment percentageNot listedNARCODebtorNorth American Refractories Company, et al.CourtWestern District of PennsylvaniaPetition2002Payment percentageNot listedNational GypsumDebtorAsbestos Claims Management Corporation (formerly National Gypsum Company)CourtNorthern District of Texas, Dallas Division (confirmation order)Petition2002Payment percentage45%as of Jan 19, 2023Owens Corning/FibreboardDebtorOwens Corning and its affiliated debtors, including Fibreboard CorporationCourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2000Payment percentage4.3%as of Jun 30, 2026Pittsburgh CorningDebtorPittsburgh Corning CorporationCourtNot listedPetition2000Payment percentageNot listedPlibricoDebtorPlibrico Company and Plibrico Sales and Service, Inc.CourtNot listedPetition2002Payment percentage0.94%as of Oct 1, 2024Porter HaydenDebtorPorter Hayden CompanyCourtNot listedPetitionNot listedPayment percentageNot listedRaytechDebtorRaytech Corporation (with Raymark Industries, Inc. and Raymark Corporation, jointly...CourtDistrict of ConnecticutPetition1989Payment percentageNot listedSPHC / BondexDebtorSpecialty Products Holding Corp.; Bondex International, Inc.; Republic Powdered Metals,...CourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2010Payment percentageNot listedTHANDebtorT H Agriculture & Nutrition, L.L.C.CourtNot listedPetition2008Payment percentage16.3%as of Sep 1, 2026USGDebtorUSG Corporation and its debtor subsidiaries, including United States Gypsum CompanyCourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2001Payment percentage10%as of Jun 30, 2026W.R. GraceDebtorW. R. Grace & Co. and its debtor subsidiariesCourtDistrict of DelawarePetition2001Payment percentage30.1%as of Apr 17, 2025Western MacArthurDebtorWestern Asbestos Company, Western MacArthur Co., and MacArthur Co.CourtNorthern District of CaliforniaPetition2002Payment percentage51.1%as of Apr 11, 2024
Published payment percentages
Percent of liquidated claim value
  1. Western MacArthur51.1% · Apr 11, 2024
  2. National Gypsum45% · Jan 19, 2023
  3. W.R. Grace30.1% · Apr 17, 2025
  4. Duro Dyne20% · Jul 10, 2026
  5. THAN16.3% · Sep 1, 2026
  6. Combustion Engineeringreduced from 20.0%15.3% · Apr 1, 2026
  7. Kaiser Aluminum10.6% · Feb 5, 2025
  8. USG10% · Jun 30, 2026
  9. Armstrong Worldreduced from 10.8%7.8% · Oct 5, 2026
  10. Celotexindividualized review claims7% · Jun 23, 2023
  11. Leslie Controls6.25% · Jul 14, 2025
  12. A.P. Green6% · Apr 13, 2026
  13. Manvillepro rata payment percentage5.6% · Sep 3, 2026
  14. Owens Corning/FibreboardOwens Corning Sub-Account4.3% · Jun 30, 2026
  15. Babcock & Wilcox4.3% · Jun 30, 2026
  16. H.K. Porter3% · Jan 9, 2025
  17. Federal-MogulT&N Subfund2.9% · Jun 30, 2026
  18. Plibrico0.94% · Oct 1, 2024
Figure 1Payment percentage by trust, with the date each trust stated. Only trusts whose own site or notice states a percentage appear. Where a trust runs sub-accounts, the first figure is shown and the sub-account is named under the trust.Source: each trust's website or published notice, reviewed November 13, 2026. Confirm the current percentage with the trust before relying on it.
How asbestos trusts work

What an asbestos bankruptcy trust is

An asbestos bankruptcy trust is a fund created when a company that faced asbestos injury claims reorganizes in Chapter 11. The company keeps operating or winds down, and the trust takes over the job of paying the people who were injured. Claimants file with the trust instead of suing the debtor in court. Each trust has its own assets, its own trustees and its own written rules for deciding and paying claims.

How Section 524(g) channels claims

Section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code, enacted in 1994, lets a reorganization plan create a trust for present and future asbestos claims. A court then issues a channeling injunction. The injunction sends every covered claim against the debtor, and against certain related parties named in the plan, to the trust and bars suit anywhere else.

The statute sets conditions for that protection. Among them, the plan must be approved by a supermajority of the asbestos claimants who vote, a legal representative must be appointed to speak for people whose illness has not yet appeared, and the trust must be funded at least in part with securities of the debtor or a right to future payments from it. Trusts created before 1994, such as the one established in the Johns-Manville case, were built under earlier plan terms.

The trust distribution procedures

Every trust operates under a document usually called the trust distribution procedures, or TDP. It is the rulebook. It lists the medical criteria a claimant must meet, the exposure evidence the trust will accept, the disease categories it pays and the scheduled value assigned to each. It also sets the order in which claims are processed, the deadlines and the appeal path. Two trusts can treat the same diagnosis very differently, so the TDP of the specific trust controls.

Expedited review and individual review

Most TDPs offer two tracks. Expedited review pays a claim at a fixed scheduled value once the claimant documents the required diagnosis and exposure. It is faster and less costly to pursue, and it gives a predictable result. Individual review looks at the particular claim, including the claimant's injuries, work history and the circumstances of exposure, and it can produce a value above or below the schedule within limits the TDP sets. Claimants who qualify for individual review usually give up the speed of the expedited track in exchange for a case-specific evaluation.

What a payment percentage is and why it changes

Scheduled values are not what a claimant receives. Trustees apply a payment percentage to the liquidated value of a claim, and the result is the payment. The trustees set the percentage by comparing the trust's assets with the claims it expects to pay over its life, based on a projection of future claim filings and values. If new filings, investment results or claim values move away from the projection, the trustees can raise or lower the percentage. For that reason a payment percentage is only accurate on the date the trust states, and the trust's own website or notices are the place to confirm it.

How trust claims interact with tort litigation

A claimant with mesothelioma or another asbestos disease often has two tracks at once. Companies that were never in bankruptcy can still be sued in the tort system, and companies that went through bankruptcy are reached through their trusts. Trust claims can usually be filed in parallel with a lawsuit, and many TDPs have their own filing deadlines separate from the state statute of limitations that governs the lawsuit.

The two tracks affect each other. Exposure evidence submitted to a trust can come up in the tort case, and tort defendants may seek information about trust claims when they argue that other companies share responsibility. Settlement agreements in a lawsuit can also bear on how a trust treats the same claimant. Sequencing and disclosure are questions for the claimant's counsel, not for a directory.

Payment percentages change. Confirm the current percentage with the trust before relying on it.

General information, not legal advice. Each trust's own procedures and notices control.

Don't see the trust you're exposed to?
Send us the trust name and our institutional team will look at it directly.
Contact Us

Next step

Ready when you are.

Tell the Capital desk about the case, the firm or the book. Independent funders each decide on their own.

Start a request

Need analysis rather than funding? Criterica Intelligence