- 51.1% · Apr 11, 2024
- 45% · Jan 19, 2023
- 30.1% · Apr 17, 2025
- 20% · Jul 10, 2026
- 16.3% · Sep 1, 2026
- 15.3% · Apr 1, 2026
- 10.6% · Feb 5, 2025
- 10% · Jun 30, 2026
- 7.8% · Oct 5, 2026
- 7% · Jun 23, 2023
- 6.25% · Jul 14, 2025
- 6% · Apr 13, 2026
- 5.6% · Sep 3, 2026
- 4.3% · Jun 30, 2026
- 4.3% · Jun 30, 2026
- 3% · Jan 9, 2025
- 2.9% · Jun 30, 2026
- 0.94% · Oct 1, 2024
What an asbestos bankruptcy trust is
An asbestos bankruptcy trust is a fund created when a company that faced asbestos injury claims reorganizes in Chapter 11. The company keeps operating or winds down, and the trust takes over the job of paying the people who were injured. Claimants file with the trust instead of suing the debtor in court. Each trust has its own assets, its own trustees and its own written rules for deciding and paying claims.
How Section 524(g) channels claims
Section 524(g) of the Bankruptcy Code, enacted in 1994, lets a reorganization plan create a trust for present and future asbestos claims. A court then issues a channeling injunction. The injunction sends every covered claim against the debtor, and against certain related parties named in the plan, to the trust and bars suit anywhere else.
The statute sets conditions for that protection. Among them, the plan must be approved by a supermajority of the asbestos claimants who vote, a legal representative must be appointed to speak for people whose illness has not yet appeared, and the trust must be funded at least in part with securities of the debtor or a right to future payments from it. Trusts created before 1994, such as the one established in the Johns-Manville case, were built under earlier plan terms.
The trust distribution procedures
Every trust operates under a document usually called the trust distribution procedures, or TDP. It is the rulebook. It lists the medical criteria a claimant must meet, the exposure evidence the trust will accept, the disease categories it pays and the scheduled value assigned to each. It also sets the order in which claims are processed, the deadlines and the appeal path. Two trusts can treat the same diagnosis very differently, so the TDP of the specific trust controls.
Expedited review and individual review
Most TDPs offer two tracks. Expedited review pays a claim at a fixed scheduled value once the claimant documents the required diagnosis and exposure. It is faster and less costly to pursue, and it gives a predictable result. Individual review looks at the particular claim, including the claimant's injuries, work history and the circumstances of exposure, and it can produce a value above or below the schedule within limits the TDP sets. Claimants who qualify for individual review usually give up the speed of the expedited track in exchange for a case-specific evaluation.
What a payment percentage is and why it changes
Scheduled values are not what a claimant receives. Trustees apply a payment percentage to the liquidated value of a claim, and the result is the payment. The trustees set the percentage by comparing the trust's assets with the claims it expects to pay over its life, based on a projection of future claim filings and values. If new filings, investment results or claim values move away from the projection, the trustees can raise or lower the percentage. For that reason a payment percentage is only accurate on the date the trust states, and the trust's own website or notices are the place to confirm it.
How trust claims interact with tort litigation
A claimant with mesothelioma or another asbestos disease often has two tracks at once. Companies that were never in bankruptcy can still be sued in the tort system, and companies that went through bankruptcy are reached through their trusts. Trust claims can usually be filed in parallel with a lawsuit, and many TDPs have their own filing deadlines separate from the state statute of limitations that governs the lawsuit.
The two tracks affect each other. Exposure evidence submitted to a trust can come up in the tort case, and tort defendants may seek information about trust claims when they argue that other companies share responsibility. Settlement agreements in a lawsuit can also bear on how a trust treats the same claimant. Sequencing and disclosure are questions for the claimant's counsel, not for a directory.
Payment percentages change. Confirm the current percentage with the trust before relying on it.
General information, not legal advice. Each trust's own procedures and notices control.
Next step
Ready when you are.
Tell the Capital desk about the case, the firm or the book. Independent funders each decide on their own.
Start a requestRelated reading
Need analysis rather than funding? Criterica Intelligence
