Eagle-Picher Asbestos Trust: Claims and Payment

Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. Personal Injury Settlement Trust

Debtor
Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. et al.
Bankruptcy court
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division
Case no.
91-10100
Plan confirmed
1996
Asbestos history and bankruptcy

The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio confirmed the Third Amended Plan of Reorganization in the Eagle-Picher Chapter 11 case, Case No. 91-10100, on November 18, 1996. That plan established the Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. Personal Injury Settlement Trust. Section 3.2.17 of the plan provided for establishing the trust with the primary purpose of resolving asbestos personal injury claims. The confirmation order contains a channeling injunction that directs those claims to the trust, and the plan states that the sole recourse of a holder of such a claim is to the trust. In an April 2025 memorandum order the bankruptcy court granted the trust summary judgment on a request to reopen review of a claim, which shows the trust and the court's continuing jurisdiction were still active in 2025.

Timeline on file
1996Plan confirmed2026Last reviewed1996Plan confirmed2026Last reviewed
Sources

Compiled from the trust's published documents and court records, cited below. Last reviewed November 13, 2026.

  1. Memorandum Order, In re Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Case 1:91-bk-10100, Doc. 7095 (April 28, 2025)

Criterica Capital prices legal assets from court records and private settlement data and prepares requests for independent funders, who each decide on their own. Criterica Capital does not fund, lend or decide.

General information, not legal advice. The trust's own procedures and notices control.

Holding Eagle-Picher claims or inventory?
Send the details and our institutional team will respond within one business day.

Next step

Ready when you are.

Tell the Capital desk about the case, the firm or the book. Independent funders each decide on their own.

Start a request

Need analysis rather than funding? Criterica Intelligence