MDL TrackerProducts Liability

Chrysler Pacifica Fire Recall

MDL No. 3040  ·  U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
MDL No.
3040
Docket Type
Products Liability
Transferee Judge
Hon. David M. Lawson
Centralized
2022-08-03
Actions Pending
11
As Of
2026-09-01
Funding Considerations

This docket consolidates economic-loss claims from owners of Chrysler Pacifica plug-in hybrid minivans following a manufacturer recall tied to a defect alleged to increase the risk of engine-compartment fires, centralized before Judge David M. Lawson in the Eastern District of Michigan in August 2022. With 11 actions pending against 13 total filed, this is a small docket that has remained largely intact since formation, consistent with a contained, single-defect vehicle-recall matter rather than a large, sprawling mass tort.

As a vehicle economic-loss matter — diminished value, cost of repair, or loss-of-use claims tied to the recall rather than personal injury — this docket fits the commercial litigation finance frame rather than a mass-tort profile: claim value correlates with vehicle ownership records, model-year and production-date ranges covered by the recall, and any documented repair or diminished-value costs, which supports relatively straightforward diligence once ownership and recall-eligibility records are verified.

Given the docket's small size, this is better suited to single-matter or narrow-portfolio commercial litigation finance than a large-scale inventory facility — a law firm holding a handful of Pacifica owner-plaintiffs has a tractable, well-defined claim book to evaluate, with duration risk shaped by ordinary economic-loss litigation mechanics (damages proof and any manufacturer defenses regarding the scope or effectiveness of the recall remedy) rather than a contested general-causation fight. Criterica Capital's commercial litigation finance line fits this kind of matter, and a structural brief on the docket's procedural posture is available through Criterica Intelligence.

Frequently Asked Questions
What kind of claims does this MDL involve?
+
Is there meaningful funding scale in this docket?
+
What diligence points matter for a claim here?
+
What financing product fits this docket?
+

Pre-settlement funding is a non-recourse purchase of a portion of the proceeds of a pending legal claim — not a loan. If the case does not result in a recovery, nothing is owed. Rates, fees, and repayment terms are disclosed in full in the funding agreement, which the applicant’s attorney reviews before signing. Availability and terms vary by state.

Litigation structure and resolution-risk brief on Criterica Intelligence →
Holding Chrysler Pacifica Fire Recall claims or inventory?
Send the details and our institutional team will respond within one business day.