Car Accident Funding in Massachusetts

Car Accident Pre-Settlement Funding in Massachusetts

State rules that shape pre-settlement funding for Massachusetts car accident claims, accounting for the no-fault threshold and the state's mandatory 12% prejudgment interest.

Non-recourse funding is repaid only from a settlement or award. Independent capital providers set the terms.

Bills do not wait for your case.

Rent, medical bills and living costs keep arriving while a case moves through the court. An advance against a pending case can cover them and is repaid only if the case produces a recovery.

Massachusetts law and funding terms: Car Accident Funding

The Massachusetts rules that shape this claim

The rules below shape how a Massachusetts car accident funding claim is underwritten and how quickly it can move toward resolution.

Statute of Limitations

Three years from the date of the accident (M.G.L. c.260, §2A).

Comparative Fault Rule

Modified comparative negligence — a plaintiff found 51% or more responsible for their own injury recovers nothing (M.G.L. c.231, §85).

Damages Caps

No general cap on non-economic damages in an ordinary auto-negligence case.

Pre-Judgment Interest

Mandatory at a fixed 12% per year, running from the date the cause of action arose — the date of the accident, not the filing date (M.G.L. c.231, §6B). This is a notably high, fixed statutory rate rather than one tied to prevailing market interest rates.

Venue

The county where the defendant resides or where the claim arose (M.G.L. c.223, §1).

Funding-Specific Statute

Massachusetts has no dedicated consumer litigation funding statute. No statutory cap.

State law

How Massachusetts regulates consumer legal funding

Statute
Massachusetts has no dedicated consumer litigation funding statute.
Rate or fee limit
No statutory cap. Massachusetts has no enacted consumer litigation funding statute; a pending bill (S.680) would create a 36% annual charge cap, but it has not passed.
Disclosure
None required by statute.

Reviewed September 17, 2026. Legal information, not legal advice.

Terms

How terms are set for Massachusetts plaintiffs

Rates and terms are set by the capital provider and written in the provider’s agreement before signing.

Term
How it works
Decision
Made by the independent capital provider, not by Criterica Capital
Advance size
Set by the capital provider
Pricing
Set by the capital provider and written in its agreement before signing
Repayment
Non-recourse funding is repaid only from a recovery. The provider’s agreement states the terms.
Typical timeline

Massachusetts car accident claims typically clear the state's no-fault medical-expense threshold quickly given how low it is relative to real treatment costs, so most claims proceed to a standard liability claim without a serious threshold fight; because Massachusetts also mandates a fixed 12%-per-year prejudgment interest rate running from the date of the accident, insurers have a strong incentive to resolve claims before that interest compounds the case's ultimate cost, which tends to keep undisputed-liability claims moving at a reasonably predictable pace.

How Massachusetts law affects funding this claim

How does Massachusetts's no-fault threshold affect a car accident claim?

Massachusetts requires a plaintiff to show either more than $2,000 in reasonable medical expenses or one of several enumerated serious-injury categories — death, loss of a body member, permanent and serious disfigurement, certain hearing or vision loss, or a fracture — before pursuing a pain-and-suffering claim against the other driver (M.G.L. c.231, §6D).

That $2,000 medical-expense threshold has not been adjusted for inflation in decades and is low relative to the cost of real medical treatment today, so in practice most car accident claims involving genuine injury clear it without a serious dispute. This is a meaningfully lower bar than the more heavily litigated 'serious injury' thresholds in New York or Michigan, which makes threshold disputes a comparatively smaller part of Massachusetts underwriting.

Why does Massachusetts's mandatory 12% prejudgment interest rate matter for funding a claim?

Massachusetts mandates prejudgment interest at a fixed 12% per year, running from the date of the accident itself rather than the filing date (M.G.L. c.231, §6B). That's both unusually high and unusually predictable compared to most states' interest rules, which are either discretionary, tied to a variable market rate, or don't apply pre-verdict at all.

Because the rate is fixed and the accrual start date is the accident date, a Massachusetts claim's interest component can be calculated with more certainty than in a state with a variable or discretionary rule. A claim that has been pending for an extended period carries a substantial and precisely quantifiable interest component on top of the underlying compensatory damages. Combined with the state's comparatively low no-fault threshold, this makes Massachusetts one of the more predictable states for projecting how a car accident claim's value will develop over the course of litigation.

FAQ

Car Accident Funding questions in Massachusetts

Sources & references

M.G.L. c.260, §2A · M.G.L. c.231, §85 · M.G.L. c.231, §6B · M.G.L. c.223, §1 · M.G.L. c.231, §6D

Reviewed September 17, 2026. Legal information, not legal advice.

Pre-settlement funding is a non-recourse purchase of a portion of the proceeds of a pending legal claim — not a loan. If the case does not result in a recovery, nothing is owed. Rates, fees, and repayment terms are disclosed in full in the funding agreement, which the applicant’s attorney reviews before signing. Availability and terms vary by state.

Keep reading